Skip to main content

Cornell University Researchers Release Blockchain Study

Decentralization in Bitcoin and Ethereum Networks, a peer reviewed study from the Initiative for Cryptocurrencies and Contracts (IC3) at Cornell University, lead by Emin Gün Sirer (associate professor and co-founder of IC3), is bound to make some waves. Originally scheduled to be presented February at the Financial Cryptography and Data Security conference in Curaçao, the paper was released online and made available to the public 15 January 2018.
The paper measures the actual practice of decentralization, rather than hype to that effect, surrounding two the largest market cap cryptocurrency networks, Bitcoin and Ethereum. Researchers examine nodes and their interconnection, protocol requirements, and how they stand up to attacks, using the Falcon Relay Network (FRN) to gather data.Cornell Univ. Researchers: Bitcoin Not as Decentralized as Assumed
FRN disseminates blocks, connecting miners, full nodes, and ferries blocks by reducing orphans. In turn, the network overall is more efficient and can concentrate on security with the ultimate goal of helping Bitcoin scale by effectively decoupling disseminating block speed from network size. The hope is doing so will level the playing field among miners and increase decentralization.
Along with colleagues Adem Efe Gencer, Soumya Basu, Ittay Eyal, Robbert van Renesse, the paper studies years 2015 through 2017, building on their earlier 2016 position paper. It appears bandwidth for Bitcoin nodes has increased by 1.7 times since 2016. With more allocation of bandwidth, researchers claim, block size can increase without impacting decentralization. And with an increase per second cleared, transactions for bitcoin should be able to nearly double – a major bone of contention for users.
Cornell Univ. Researchers: Bitcoin Not as Decentralized as Assumed

Mining Concentration

If the worry then shifts to disk requirements, the authors point out how the costs of CPUs and disk space generally have bettered inversely: lower prices and more space. They argue, “To date, we have seen no sound, quantitative arguments for any specific value of the maximum block size in Bitcoin,” insisting there is “dissonance between the technical-soundness of the arguments and the actual technical facts on the ground.” 
Cornell Univ. Researchers: Bitcoin Not as Decentralized as Assumed
Emin Gün Sirer
“Compared to Ethereum, Bitcoin nodes tend to be more clustered together, both in terms of network latency as well as geographically,” the study insists. “Put another way, there are more Ethereum nodes, and they are better spread out around the world. That indicates that the full node distribution for Ethereum is much more decentralized.” Researchers attribute this to data centers holding a larger percentage of Bitcoin nodes, over half in fact. Ethereum data center nodes, by contrast, account for little over a quarter.   
Data centers can become troublesome in the quest for decentralization because they’re often held by corporations. Node counts can also help skew public opinion through what are known as Sybil attacks. Sybil attacks can overinflate influence in a peer-to-peer system, making it appear there to be more consensus than the actual reality. These are real concerns for consensus networks like Bitcoin.
The study indeed found in both Ethereum and Bitcoin “mining [is] very centralized, with the top four miners in Bitcoin and the top three miners in Ethereum controlling more than 50% of the hash rate.” Indeed, the “entire blockchain for both systems is determined by fewer than 20 mining entities.” Finally, “mining rewards are more unpredictable for smaller miners in Bitcoin” compared to Ethereum. “This is partly because the high block rate in Ethereum helps provide many more opportunities for the laws of large numbers to apply in Ethereum, while Bitcoin, with its infrequent blocks, can exhibit much more uncertainty from month to month.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MYSTERY OF BERMUDA TRIANGLE FINALLY SOLVED

MYSTERY OF BERMUDA TRIANGLE FINALLY SOLVED   17 COMMENTS    23472 VIEWS Bermuda Triangle Mystery Solved? Scientists believe they’ve solved the mystery of the Bermuda Triangle ― and it’s not UFOs or sea monsters. It’s another kind of monster: monster waves. The Bermuda Triangle, also known as the Devil’s Triangle, is a region in the North Atlantic that is generally bounded by Miami, Bermuda and Puerto Rico. Over time, a number of aircraft and ships are said to have disappeared there under mysterious circumstances. According to “The Bermuda Triangle Enigma” on Britain’s Channel 5, scientists now believe conditions in that area were just right for massive rogue waves. “There are storms to the south and north, which come together,” said University of Southampton oceanographer Simon Boxall, per the Sun. “And if there are additional ones from Florida, it can be a potentially deadly formation of rogue waves.” Boxall said these rogue waves could reach 100 fee...

EZeugo Is the Right Candidate For Idemili North Constituency.

A sound mind is a healthy body, unfortunately most of our people suffer from various diseases as a result of their life style,water the drink, type of food the eat (poor dieting) and drugs abuse which in return leads to many complications in the later stages of their lives. Majority of our people over the age of fourty  suffer from specific health problems E.g heart diseases, advanced diabetes, blood pressure (BP). In my view the issue of health is not limited to health services, health is a specific culture that can be attened by harmonizing body and mind. To reach this health conditions, in addition to a good healthy services, base on my background in Health and Environmental Safety (HES) I Ezeugo have a good health investment programs that will help improve following area - health education, Custom and traditions, food and environmental hygiene, sports, provisions of safe drinking water, public awareness in various aspects of life. Ezeugo have all it take to make Idemili...

The Satoshi Revolution – Chapter 5: ICOs

The Satoshi Revolution: A Revolution of Rising Expectations. Section 2 : The Moral Imperative of Privacy Chapter 5: Implementing Crypto Privacy by Wendy McElroy ICOs: Peril or Menace or Expression of Satoshi Spirit? (Chapter 5, Part 2) It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way… – Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities Crypto advocates differ dramatically on the impact of Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). They are a valuable dynamic that financed Ethereum’s smart contract; they are a blank cheque for scammers; they give government a wedge with which to separate cryptocurrency from freedom. The damnable thing is that all the assessments may...